Evaluasi Penerapan Green Building pada Gedung Kuliah Terpadu Politeknik Negeri Manado Berdasarkan Greenship Existing Building Versi 1.1
Keywords:
bangunan hijau, greenship existing building v1.1, penilaian greenship, keberlanjutan bangunan, Politeknik Negeri ManadoAbstract
Krisis lingkungan global dan kontribusi sektor bangunan terhadap emisi gas rumah kaca (30–40% dari total emisi dunia) mendorong penerapan prinsip green building untuk mengurangi dampak lingkungan sekaligus meningkatkan kualitas ruang bagi penghuni. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi penerapan konsep green building pada Gedung Kuliah Terpadu Politeknik Negeri Manado menggunakan standar Greenship Existing Building versi 1.1 dari Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI). Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif melalui observasi lapangan, telaah dokumen, dan wawancara mendalam, dengan fokus pada enam kategori utama: ASD, EEC, WAC, MRC, IHC, dan BEM.Hasil menunjukkan gedung hanya memperoleh 4 poin secara sah (3,42% dari 117 poin maksimal), seluruhnya dari kategori IHC (pemenuhan prasyarat serta kredit IHC 1 dan IHC 2). Kategori ASD, EEC, WAC, MRC, dan BEM tidak memperoleh poin karena ketidakpenuhan prasyarat wajib. Jika semua prasyarat terpenuhi, potensi skor mencapai 19 poin (16,05%), dengan rincian: ASD 9 poin, EEC 2 poin, MRC 4 poin, dan IHC 4 poin. Namun, skor ini masih di bawah ambang sertifikasi Bronze (minimal 41 poin atau ≥35%). Gedung memerlukan tambahan sekitar 22 poin untuk mencapai level tersebut. Temuan ini mengindikasikan penerapan green building masih terbatas, terutama pada efisiensi energi, konservasi air, dan manajemen lingkungan. Diperlukan strategi perbaikan komprehensif pada kategori berbobot tinggi guna mendukung pencapaian bangunan hijau yang berkelanjutan.
References
[1] United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Global status report for buildings and construction 2024/2025: Not just another brick in the wall. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-status-report-buildings-and-construction-20242025
[2] Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction & United Nations Environment Programme. (2023). Global status report for buildings and construction: Beyond foundations – Mainstreaming sustainable solutions to cut emissions from the buildings sector. https://globalabc.org/sites/default/files/2024-11/global_status_report_buildings_construction_2023.pdf
[3] Huang, L., Krigsvoll, G., Johansen, F., & Liu, Y. (2021). A review of carbon footprint reduction in construction industry, from design to operation. Materials, 14(20), 6094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206094
[4] World Green Building Council. (2019). Bringing embodied carbon upfront: Overcoming barriers to carbon reduction in the building and construction sector. https://worldgbc.org/article/bringing-embodied-carbon-upfront
[5] Gou, Z., & Lau, S. S. Y. (2014). Contextualizing green building occupancy studies: A case for a holistic approach to occupant satisfaction and health. Building and Environment, 82, 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.09.016
[6] Green Building Council Indonesia. (2016). GREENSHIP Existing Building version 1.1: Summary. https://gbcindonesia.org/files/resource/093ec9dc-9f1d-47e3-805a-07887b8c4d81/Summary%20GREENSHIP%20Existing%20Building%20V1.1.pdf
[7] Sari, D. P., Steve, S., Alelo, M., & Peginusa, S. (2025, February). Implementation of a Green Campus Concept at Manado State Polytechnic Based on the UI GreenMetric in the Setting and Infrastructure Category. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1453, No. 1, p. 012034). IOP Publishing.
[8] Roshaunda, D., et al. (2019). Penilaian Kriteria Green Building Pada Bangunan Gedung Universitas Pembangunan Jaya Berdasarkan Indikasi Green Building Council Indonesia. Widyakala Journal, 6, 29. https://doi.org/10.36262/widyakala.v6i0.181
[9] Burhan, B. (2021). Green building analysis of PT United Tractors on existing building based on the latest rating tools Green Building Council Indonesia [Tesis]. Swiss German University. https://sgu.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/2.-Bakhtiar-Burhan.pdf
[10] Qodriyah, S., & Syahada, V. (2024). Analysis of compliance with green building based on Greenship of existing building: Case study of Delta Building. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382044915_Analysis_of_Compliance_with_Green_Building_Based_on_Greenship_of_Existing_Building_Case_Study_of_Delta_Building
[11] Putra, A. A., & others. (2024). The analysis of energy efficiency and conservation (EEC) strategies for public facilities by using GREENSHIP of existing building (EB) 1.1 – Case study: Malang city library building. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2991(1), Article 050024. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0206763 dan https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/2991/1/050024/3296763/The-analysis-of-energy-efficiency-and-conservation)
[12] Sari, N. P., & others. (2019). Kajian penerapan prinsip water conservation sesuai standar Greenship New Building versi 1.2: Studi kasus gedung P1 dan P2 Universitas Kristen Petra Surabaya. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333231777_KAJIAN_PENERAPAN_PRINSIP_WATER_CONSERVATION_SESUAI_STANDAR_GREENSHIP_NEW_BUILDING_VERSI_12_STUDI_KASUS_GEDUNG_P1_DAN_P2_UNIVERSITAS_KRISTEN_PETRA_SURABAYA
[13] Wulandari, A., & others. (2023). Konservasi air berdasarkan Greenship pada gedung laboratorium A. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta. https://prosiding.pnj.ac.id/index.php/snts/article/download/4919/3003
[14] Pratama, A., & others. (2022). The assessment of material resource and cycle (MRC) of architectural finishing works for tall building construction. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1116(1), Article 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1116/1/012075
[15] Chadirin, Y. (2023). Analysis of compliance with green building based on Greenship of existing building: Case study of Delta Building. In Proceedings of the 2025 Frontier in Sustainable Agromaritime and Environmental Development Conference. https://conference.ipb.ac.id/fisaed/article/view/418
[16] Prataksita, A. S. (2018). Penilaian green building berdasarkan Greenship gedung terbangun kriteria efisiensi energi serta kesehatan dan kenyamanan dalam ruang pada Gedung Balai Kota Among Tani Batu [Skripsi]. Universitas Brawijaya. http://repository.ub.ac.id/164918
[17] Nasir, M. (2022). Evaluasi bangunan hijau berdasarkan Greenship rating tools kriteria Indoor Health and Comfort. Jurnal Arsitektur dan Perencanaan (JUARA). https://ejournal.unisayogya.ac.id/index.php/JUARA/article/view/2363
[18] Pratama, A. (2023). Pengembangan Building Environmental Management (BEM) pada asrama siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) di Surakarta dengan menggunakan standar Greenship Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI) untuk Existing Building Versi 1.1 [Tesis/Skripsi]. Universitas Sebelas Maret. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/69090
[19] Adeswastoto, H., Setiawan, B., Desrimon, A., Febryanto, F., Putra, A. A., & Islah, M. (2023). Analisis Penerapan Green Building Pada Bangunan Gedung Klinik Universitas Pahlawan. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Management (JES-TM), 3(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.31004/jestm.v3i1.99
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwars Soukotta, Dian Puspita Sari, Stefani Switly Peginusa, Grace Marsheylla Irene Rompas (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
