Perancangan dan Evaluasi Struktural Model Geodatabase Identifikasi Wilayah Pengiriman Berbasis Wilayah Administrasi, Kode Pos, dan Kode Lokasi

Sumarno; Nada Nafisyah Nurulhakim

Authors

Sumarno Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung Author
Nada Nafisyah Nurulhakim EFORT Digital Multisolution Author

Keywords:

geodatabase, sistem informasi geospasial, interoperabilitas, kode lokasi, zona layanan

Abstract

Pertukaran data alamat dalam layanan logistik melibatkan informasi wilayah administrasi, kode pos, kode lokasi organisasi, dan zona layanan. Pada model awal, referensi tersebut disimpan sebagai kode gabungan dan atribut permanen pada entitas wilayah sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan redundansi, anomali pemutakhiran, dan ambiguitas antara identitas lokasi dengan perannya sebagai asal atau tujuan pengiriman. Penelitian ini bertujuan merancang dan mengevaluasi model geodatabase yang memisahkan identitas lokasi, skema kode, kode eksternal, wilayah administrasi, wilayah pos, zona layanan, dan peran lokasi dalam transaksi. Penelitian menggunakan Design Science Research Methodology melalui identifikasi masalah, perumusan persyaratan, perancangan model, demonstrasi, dan evaluasi. Evaluasi dilakukan secara formatif melalui delapan persyaratan desain, enam skenario sintetis, dan pemetaan konseptual terhadap standar terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model dapat memisahkan identitas dan peran transaksi, merepresentasikan hubungan wilayah administrasi dan wilayah pos, serta mengelola klasifikasi zona, versi, dan masa berlaku referensi. Penelitian belum menerapkan artefak pada basis data fisik atau menguji ketepatan identifikasi lokasi dan kinerja logistik pada lingkungan operasional.

References

[1] M. Cichosz, C. M. Wallenburg, and A. M. Knemeyer, “Digital Transformation at Logistics Service Providers: Barriers, Success Factors and Leading Practices,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 209–238, 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229.

[2] L. Ning and D. Yao, “The Impact of Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Capabilities and Supply Chain Competitive Performance,” Sustainability, vol. 15, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310107

[3] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 19160-1:2015 Addressing — Part 1: Conceptual model. 2015.

[4] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 19112:2019 Geographic information — Spatial referencing by geographic identifiers. 2019.

[5] Universal Postal Union, S42: International postal address components and templates. 2020.

[6] BSN, SNI 7657:2023 Singkatan Nama Kota. Indonesia, 2023.

[7] F. Noardo, “Multisource Spatial Data Integration for Use Cases Application,” Transactions in GIS, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 2874–2913, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1111/tgis.12987.

[8] Z. K. Zhai, J. W. Liu, J. J. Liu, W. H. Zhao, Y. Gao, and J. Che, “Dynamic Updating Method of Geospatial Database with Incremental Data,” in International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, May 2022, pp. 735–741. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-735-2022.

[9] H. Sutanta, N. P. P. Chintya, D. Laksono, D. Atunggal, and Diyono, “Developing Address Model and Geocoding Framework for Urban Area in Indonesia,” in Proceeding Geo-Land-SEA 2023, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2023, pp. 18–29.

[10] E. Hristov, D. Petrova-antonova, F. De Paoli, I. Krasteva, M. Ciavotta, and R. Avogadro, “Geospatial Data Enrichment through Address Geocoding: Challenges and Solutions,” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLVIII, pp. 239–245, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-2024-239-2024

[11] J. vom Brocke, A. Hevner, and A. Maedche, “Introduction to Design Science Research,” Springer, Cham, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_1.

[12] A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75–106, 2004, doi: 10.2307/25148625.

[13] K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 45–77, 2007, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.

[14] J. Chen, S. Yang, H. Li, B. Zhang, and J. Lv, “Research on Geographical Environment Unit Division Based on The Method of Natural Breaks (Jenks),” in International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2013, pp. 47–50. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-4-W3-47-2013.

[15] J. Venable, J. Pries-Heje, and R. Baskerville, “FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2016, doi: 10.1057/ejis.2014.36.