Analisis Variasi Tata Letak Dinding Geser Pada Gedung Flat Abdul Jalil Habibie Parepare Terhadap Beban Gempa Dengan Metode Analisis Pushover

Muhammad Akbar; Jasman; Adnan

Authors

Muhammad Akbar Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare Author
Jasman Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare Author
Adnan Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare Author

Keywords:

Dinding geser, analisis pushover, gaya geser dasar, perpindahan, etabs

Abstract

High-rise buildings must be designed to withstand both vertical and horizontal loads, particularly seismic loads that are dynamic in nature. As the number of stories increases, the role of lateral load-resisting elements becomes increasingly critical to ensure structural stability and safety. One of the most widely applied structural components is the shear wall, whose effectiveness is highly influenced by its location and configuration within the structural system. This study aims to analyze the effect of various shear wall positions on the capacity curve of high-rise building structures using the pushover analysis method. The research was conducted through structural modeling with four shear wall configurations using ETABS software. Pushover analysis was employed to evaluate maximum displacement and base shear values obtained from each configuration. The results indicate that the position of the shear wall significantly affects the structural response. The model without a shear wall exhibited a maximum displacement of 0.376 m, whereas the third configuration reduced displacement to 0.362 m in the X direction and 0.249 m in the Y direction. The highest base shear capacity was achieved by the second shear wall configuration, with values of 378577.496 kN (X) and 215942.281 kN (Y). Therefore, the second configuration proved to be the most effective in enhancing structural performance, as it reduced displacement while distributing lateral forces more efficiently.

References

[1] R. Trimurtiningrum, G. Sarya, H. Widhiarto, H. Walid Rohaniawan, dan M. Hafidh Masruri, “Analisis Kinerja Gedung Beton Bertulang Dengan Variasi Penempatan Dinding Geser Terhadap Beban Gempa,” vol. 11, no. 2, hal. 61–068, 2023, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://rsa.ciptakarya.pu.go.id/2021/

[2] G. A. Gunawan, A. Lisantono, dan J. Utomo, “Effect of Location and Thickness of Cantilever Shear Walls in Asymmetrical Reinforced Concrete Multi-Storey Buildings,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1488, no. 1, hal. 0–14, 2025, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1488/1/012096.

[3] A. P. Chintala, “Analisis dinding geser dan desain optimal untuk bangunan bertingkat tinggi menggunakan ETABS,” vol. 6, no. April, hal. 11018–11028, 2022.

[4] N. A. Usmat I, I. Imran, dan M. A. Sultan, “Analisa Letak Dinding Geser (Shear Wall) Terhadap Perilaku Struktur Gedung Akibat Beban Gempa,” TECHNO J. Penelit., vol. 8, no. 2, hal. 297, Okt 2019, doi: 10.33387/tk.v8i2.1327.

[5] D. T. Sipil dan D. T. Sipil, “Machine Translated by Google Jurnal Riset Internasional Teknik dan Teknologi ( IRJET ) e-ISSN : 2395-0056 ANALISIS SEISMIK MENGGUNAKAN ETABS Dinesh Kumar1 , Tuan Nandeswar Lata2 , Dr . Bharat Nagar3 Machine Translated by Google Jurnal Riset Internasional ,” hal. 2565–2573, 2020.

[6] M. N. Muna dan M. Teguh, “Perbandingan Respon Dinamis Pada Struktur Bangunan Bertingkat Tidak Beraturan Dengan Tiga Varian Konfigurasi Dinding Geser,” Teras J. J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 14, no. 2, hal. 387, Okt 2024, doi: 10.29103/tj.v14i2.1114.

[7] N. Hidayati, A. Zarkasi, H. Hariyadi, dan R. Sahlinda, “Analysis of Shear Wall Placement Configuration on Building Structure Behavior,” Reka Buana J. Ilm. Tek. Sipil dan Tek. Kim., vol. 10, no. 1, hal. 15–24, 2025, doi: 10.33366/rekabuana.v10i1.6197.

[8] M. Hafizh Gusra, S. Haris, dan R. Kurniawan, “Pengaruh Posisi Dinding Geser Terhadap Kinerja Struktur Gedung Tak Beraturan Akibat Beban Gempa,” 2023. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/cived/index

[9] J. Internasional, P. Inovatif, M. Ijirem, P. W. Ahmad, dan B. Singh, “Machine Translated by Google Perkuatan Seismik menggunakan ETABS Machine Translated by Google,” no. 1988, hal. 1–7, 2022.

[10] M. Konstanta, E. Beton, dan L. Marmer, “Mengevaluasi Konstanta Elastisitas Beton yang Dimodifikasi dengan Fly Abu dan Limbah Marmer, dan Dampaknya terhadap Bangunan Bertingkat Bangunan Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak ETABS,” 2023.

[11] S. A. Pechorskaya, V. V. Galishnikova, S. B. Gebreslassie, dan H. Y. Damir, “Structural analysis of high-rise building using ETABS and RSA software,” Struct. Mech. Eng. Constr. Build., vol. 17, no. 2, hal. 133–139, 2021, doi: 10.22363/1815-5235-2021-17-2-133-139.

[12] ATC 40, “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings,” Appl. Technol. Counc., vol. 1, hal. 346, 1996.

[13] S. 1727-2020, “Penetapan Standar Nasional Indonesia 1727 : 2020 Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria Terkait Untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur,” Badan Standarisasi Nas. 17272020, no. 8, hal. 1–336, 2020.

[14] C. Montes dan C. Angarita, “Machine Translated by Google bertingkat rendah Machine Translated by Google Struktur Pendekatan berbasis pembelajaran mesin untuk memprediksi kurva pushover bangunan rangka beton bertulang bertingkat rendah,” no. November, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.istruct.2024.107694.

[15] V. Vawadra, “Analisis Pushover Beton Semen Bertulang ( RCC ) Struktur yang Menggabungkan Serat yang Diperkuat Polimer untuk Mengatasi Ketidakteraturan Vertikal,” vol. 3075, hal. 14–19, 2024.