Analisis Kuat Tekan Sulfur Polymer Concrete dari Pemanfaatan Limbah Sulfur Tanpa dan Dengan Proses Pemadatan

Nur Fajar Aprilia Sari

Authors

Nur Fajar Aprilia Sari Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya Author

Keywords:

minyak bumi, sulfur, bata beton pejal, kuat tekan

Abstract

The mixture of hydrocarbon compounds in crude oil accounts for 90-95% of the oil's weight, while the remainder consists of non-hydrocarbons such as sulfur, oxygen, nitrogen, and metals. Sulfur in crude oil is removed due to its odor and corrosive properties. If this sulfur waste is not managed properly, it can have negative impacts on the environment. This research aims to analyze the compressive strength behavior of Sulfur Polymer Concrete (SPC) produced without a compaction process and Sulfur Polymer Concrete produced with a compaction process. SPC produced with a compaction process has a higher compressive strength than SPC produced without compaction. This is evident in the A3 variation, where the A3 variation produced with compaction has a compressive strength of 14 MPa, while the A3 variation produced without compaction has a compressive strength of 3.4 MPa. The similarity in the compressive strength of SPC produced without compaction and SPC produced with compaction lies in the pattern where the compressive strength reaches a saturation point. The addition of sulfur increases the compressive strength, and when it reaches its saturation point, the strength decreases with further addition because there is no more aggregate available to be bound, causing the sulfur to solidify.

References

[1] V. Alvarado and E. Manrique, “Enhanced oil recovery: An update review,” 2010, MDPI AG. doi: 10.3390/en3091529.

[2] P. A. Allen and J. R. Allen, “Basin Analysis: Principles and Application to Petroleum Play Assessment Third Edition.”

[3] P. K. Prasetyanto, E. Gravitiani, Suryanto, Mulyanto, and A. S. M. Al Ahmad, “The impact of economic growth on energy consumption: An error correction approach in Indonesia,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2025. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1438/1/012050.

[4] J. G. Speight, “The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum 5th Edition James G. Speight install download,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://textbookfull.com/product/natural-gas-a-basic-handbook-

[5] S. Brunet, D. Mey, G. Pérot, C. Bouchy, and F. Diehl, “On the hydrodesulfurization of FCC gasoline: A review,” Jan. 10, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.10.012.

[6] G. I. Giles, M. J. Nasim, W. Ali, and C. Jacob, “The reactive sulfur species concept: 15 years on,” May 23, 2017, MDPI. doi: 10.3390/antiox6020038.

[7] A. M. O. Mohamed and M. El Gamal, “A Novel Polymerized Sulfur Concrete for Underground Hydrogen Storage in Lined Rock Caverns,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 19, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16198595.

[8] A. . Neville, Properties of Concrete, Fifth Edition. Prentice Hall, 2012.

[9] R. Snellings, G. Mertens, and J. Elsen, “Supplementary cementitious materials,” 2012. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2012.74.6.

[10] J. J. Biernacki et al., “Cements in the 21st century: Challenges, perspectives, and opportunities,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 2746–2773, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1111/jace.14948.

[11] M. T. Hamza and A. M. Hameed, “Manufacturing Polymer Concrete by Using Reused Aggregates.” [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350214000

[12] M. P. S. N. Rizwan, M. S. Dhiwagar, M. Jesuraj, M. V. P. Vipin, M. V Veera Anbuvel, and M. S. Prabhakaran, “Feasibility and Application of Sulfur In Concrete Structures.” [Online]. Available: www.ijert.org

[13] A.-M. Onsy. Mohamed and Maisa. El-Gamal, Sulfur concrete for the construction industry : a sustainable development approach. J. Ross Pub., 2010.

[14] R. Fediuk et al., “A critical review on the properties and applications of sulfur-based concrete,” Nov. 01, 2020, MDPI AG. doi: 10.3390/ma13214712.

[15] Ahmed, Mohd, et al. "Development of concrete mixture design process using MCDM approach for sustainable concrete quality management." Sustainability 12.19 (2020): 8110.