Analysis of Technical Operational Failures Risk in TPS 3R Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

Authors

  • Faqih Mustafiq Institut Teknologi Bandung Author
  • I Made Wahyu Widyarsana Institut Teknologi Bandung Author

Keywords:

TPS 3R, FMEA, failure risk, waste management, operation

Abstract

Waste management in Indonesia continues to face operational challenges due to the predominance of the collect–transport–dispose approach, which limits waste reduction efforts at the source. This study aims to identify and prioritize technical operational failure risks in community-based waste management facilities (TPS 3R) located at TPS 3R Mutiara Bogor Raya, TPS 3R Ciparigi 2, and TPS 3R Jalan Jawa, Bogor City, Indonesia. Data were collected through field observations, semi-structured interviews with facility managers, and community questionnaires regarding waste storage and source segregation practices. Risk assessment was conducted using the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method by evaluating Severity, Occurrence, and Detection parameters to obtain Risk Priority Number (RPN) values. The results indicate that operational failure risks are primarily associated with managerial capacity, waste storage and segregation systems, collection operations, and waste processing activities. The highest priority risks include failure of operational management systems (RPN 64) and unreliable waste processing chains (RPN 60) at TPS 3R Mutiara Bogor Raya, inadequate collection route planning (RPN 48) at TPS 3R Ciparigi 2, and unequal fleet distribution (RPN 48) at TPS 3R Jalan Jawa. Overall, low source segregation participation and operational system limitations were identified as dominant factors influencing TPS 3R performance. Strengthening management systems, operational planning, and community participation is therefore essential to improve facility sustainability.

References

[1] M. Medina, “Solid Wastes, Poverty, and the Environment in Developing Country Cities: Challenges and Opportunities,” Urban. Dev. Multidiscip. Perspect., 2011, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590148.003.0015.

[2] Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Undang Undang Republik Indonesia, No. 18, 2008.

[3] Sakti, Rahmad Dwiky Satria. "Peran tempat pengolahan sampah 3R (reduce, reuse, recycle) dalam mengurangi pengangkutan sampah TPA di kawasan Kabupaten Sleman." Environmental Engineering Journal ITATS 2.2 (2022): 1-10.

[4] I. M. W. Widyarsana, Khairunisa, N. S. Dewi, Qurratu, A. Meilita, and R. H. Nurulloh, “Analisis Aspek Pengelolaan Sampah di TPS 3R Sauyunan,” J. Serambi Eng., vol. IX, no. 3, pp. 9269–9281, 2024.

[5] Project Management Institute, PMBOK® Guide Sixth Edition (PMI, 2017), 6th ed., vol. 6. 2017. Project Management Institute. Available: http://www.citeulike.org/group/14887/article/9008974

[6] ISO/IEC, IEC 31010:2019, Risk Management, Risk Assessment Techniques, 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, 2019.

[7] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2017.

[8] M. Rahardjo, Antara Konsep, Proposisi, Teori, Variabel dan Hipotesis dalam Penelitian. Malang, Indonesia: Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/2410/2/2410.pdf.

[9] J. Pan and P. Liu, “Exploring waste separation using an extended theory of planned behavior: A comparison between adults and children,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1337969.

[10] Hafsah, Akmali Khansa, and A. M. Asih. "Household behavior on plastic waste separation in Indonesia." IEOM Society International 9 (2021): 2493.

[11] Badan Standardisasi Nasional, SNI 19-2454-2002: Tata Cara Teknik Operasional Pengelolaan Sampah Perkotaan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2002.

[12] Hadi, Sumasno. "Pemeriksaan Keabsahan data penelitian kualitatif pada skripsi." Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 22.1 (2016): 74-79.

[13] M. N. H. R. Abd Samad, M. I. H. Mohammad Nasir, N. Mohamad Arif, and M. A. A. Zakaria, “Risk Assessment for Municipal Waste Collection at Majlis Bandaraya Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu,” MAEH Journal of Environmental Health, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 41–46, 2021.

[14] Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Corps Risk Analysis Gateway Training Module: Risk Assessment – Qualitative Methods. Alexandria, VA, USA: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2025.

[15] K. A. S. Dipayani, C. Meidiana, and S. A. Mustaniroh, “Strategy to Improve Community-Based Waste Reduction Potential (Case Study at TPS 3R Pudak Mesari, Darmasaba Village, Badung Regency),” Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 43s, pp. 672–683, 2025, doi: 10.52783/jisem.v10i43s.8466.

Downloads

Published

29/07/2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
“Analysis of Technical Operational Failures Risk in TPS 3R Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)”, jse, vol. 11, no. 3, Jul. 2026, Accessed: Jul. 31, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://jse.serambimekkah.id/index.php/jse/article/view/1981

Similar Articles

11-20 of 632

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.