Safety and Operational Efficiency Analysis of Rope Access Method on Non-Linear Geometrical Structure of Monumen Tugu Reog Ponorogo

Muhammad Fajar Mahmud Ananta; Firman Ardiansyah Ekoanindiyo

Authors

Muhammad Fajar Mahmud Ananta Universitas Stikubank Author
Firman Ardiansyah Ekoanindiyo Universitas Stikubank Author

Keywords:

rope access, cost efficiency, tugu reog monument, AS/NZS 4360:2004, hirarc

Abstract

The construction of the 60-meter high Monumen Tugu Reog Ponorogo by CV Gendhis Multi Karya faces extreme vertical accessibility challenges due to the non-linear curved geometry of the structure (dadak merak and barongan). The use of conventional scaffolding is considered slow, expensive, and poses a high risk of damaging the brass ornaments. This study aims to analyze the comparison of operational effectiveness (time, labor, cost) and occupational safety risk levels between scaffolding and rope access methods using the HIRARC matrix based on AS/NZS 4360:2004. Comparative analysis results show that rope access reduces equipment mobilization time by 87.5% (from 12 days to 1.5 days), saves active labor by 70.0% (from 10 people to 3 people), and cuts operational costs by 70.83% (from IDR 120,000,000 to IDR 35,000,000). The initial risk assessment indicates that all working at height activities fall into the High risk category (scores 10-15). After designing technical mitigation actions including dynamic anchor testing of at least 15kN in accordance with BS EN 795:2012 standards, thick canvas corner protectors, and a maximum wind speed limit of 20 knots (37 km/h), the risk level was successfully reduced to the Low category (residual risk scores 2-3). The implementation of rope access is proven to be the optimal solution that guarantees both safety and productivity aspects in the construction of cultural heritage buildings with complex geometries.

References

[1] A. Bramantyo And A. Wibowo, “Analisis Risiko Keselamatan Kerja Pada Pekerjaan Konstruksi Ketinggian Menggunakan Metode Bowtie,” J. Matriks Tek. Sipil, Vol. 10, No. 2, Pp. 185–192, 2022.

[2] I. K. Gede, K. Adi, P. I. Wahyuni, And I. W. Runa, “Model Pengelolaan Proyek Bangunan Pura Lempuyang Madya,” J. Ris. Teknol. dan Manaj., Vol. 5, No. 1, Pp. 146–154, 2025.

[3] Aziz, Napoleon Naufal, et al. "Analisa Potensi Bahaya Pada Pekerjaan Pemasangan Scaffolding Overhaul Boiler Pltu Pelabuhanratu." Jurnal Rekayasa Teknologi Nusa Putra 8.1 (2022): 16-24.

[4] B. Rachmatulloh, “Pana Rope Access Dalam Optimalisasi Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3),” J. Pendidik. Dan Teknol. Indones., Vol. 12, No. 2, 2023.

[5] E. W. Asih And H. Kurniawan, “Pengukuran Beban Kerja Fisik dan Beban Kerja Mental Berbasis Ergonomi Terhadap Karyawan PT. Woneel Midas Leathers,” J. Teknol. Ist Akprind, No. 0274, 2022.

[6] Tjahjono, Budi, Dermawan Zebua, and Vira Mita. "Analisis kajian literatur risiko keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (K3) dalam pembangunan gedung bertingkat di Indonesia." Jurnal Penelitian Jalan Dan Jembatan 3.2 (2023): 11-16.

[7] M. A. Akmal, K. Rusba, I. Siboro, And U. Balikpapan, “Analisis Penilaian Contractor Management System (CSMS) Pada Kontraktor PT . XYZ,” J. Keselam. Transp. dan Ind., Vol. 12, No. 1, Pp. 305–312, 2026.

[8] Ferlania, Dianda Aryntya Firia, Rana Atikah Ardlianti, and Adelina Zian Andriani. "Analisa Penerapan SMK3 (Sistem Manajemen Kesehatan Dan Keselamatan Kerja) Pada Proyek Konstruksi Di Kota Lamongan." Industri Inovatif: Jurnal Teknik Industri 14.2 (2024): 244-248.

[9] B. Bramantio, “Analisis Risiko Kecelakaan Kerja Menggunakan Metode Bowtie Pada Proyek The Grandstand Surabaya,” J. Teknik ITS., Vol. 10, No. 2, 2021.

[10] M. Ilham And F. Rachmawati, “Analisa Kelayakan Finansial Proyek Apartemen (Studi Kasus : Tower Aubrey Grand Shamaya Surabaya),” J. Teknik ITS, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2021.

[11] J. V. Mandagi, S. Nisumanti, And N. Puspita, “Evaluasi Kinerja Biaya Dan Waktu Pada Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Bracing Perkuatan Tiang Pancang Proyek Tol Kapal Betung Paket I Seksi Ia,” J. Ilmiah Tekno GlobaL, Vol. 11, No. 02, Pp. 67–71, 2022.

[12] T. Dahniar And F. D. Ibnu, “Penerapan Metode Hirarc Untuk Pengelolaan Risiko Kesehatan Dan Keselamatan Kerja Di Industri Besi,” Industri Inovatif : Jurnal Teknik Industri ITN Malang, Pp. 34–39, 2025.

[13] M. Riyan, P. Sukapto, And T. Yogasara, “Perbaikan Sistem Kerja Untuk Meningkatkan Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Serta Produktivitas Melalui Pendekatan Ergonomi Partisipatif ( Studi Kasus Di PT . Eka Karya Sinergi Bandung ),” Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, Vol. 12, No. 2, Pp. 237–250, 2023.

[14] Sáez, Pedro Ignacio, et al. "Determining the Safest Anchoring Knot in a Fall Arrest System by Means of Static Tests." Symmetry 16.2 (2024): 167.

[15] Devi, Mauren Helvia. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekrutmen Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI). Diss. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2022.

[16] G. Smarandana, A. Momon, And J. Arifin, “Penilaian Risiko K3 Pada Proses Pabrikasi Menggunakan Metode Hazard Identification , Risk Assessment And Risk Control (Hirarc),” J. Intech Tek. Ind. Univ. Serang Raya, Vol. 7, No. 1, Pp. 56–62, 2021.