Respon Struktur Bangunan Terhadap Perbedaan Kapasitas Kolom Pada Antar Tingkat Dan Pengaruh Gaya Gempa

Authors

  • Fazrial Ridha Ghifari Universitas Palangka Raya Author
  • Liliana Universitas Palangka Raya Author
  • Frieda Universitas Palangka Raya Author

Keywords:

kapasitas kolom, struktur bangunan, gaya gempa, respon dinamik

Abstract

The difference in column capacity between levels in multi-story buildings can significantly affect the overall structural behavior in response to seismic loads. This study aims to analyze the structural response of a building due to different column capacities at each floor to earthquake forces. The object of the study is the High Prosecutor’s Office Building of Central Kalimantan Province, which features columns with varying dimensions and reinforcement quantities on each level. The analysis was conducted using the dynamic spectrum response method based on SNI 1726:2019, focusing on column behavior and its impact on the structure. The results of the study indicate that differences in column capacity lead to an imbalance in force distribution, particularly in the lower-level columns, which bear greater loads. Columns with lower capacity on the upper floors reduce vertical stiffness, which triggers stress concentrations at the connections. Consequently, there is an increase in inter-level drift that could exceed permissible limits. Additionally, structures with uneven column capacity tend to violate the strong column-weak beam principle, resulting in a higher risk of damage. Therefore, uniform or increasing column capacity downwards is necessary to maintain structural stability.

References

[1] L. Irawan, L. H. Hasibuan, and F. Fauzi, “Analisa Prediksi Efek Kerusakan Gempa Dari Magnitudo (Skala Richter) Dengan Metode Algoritma Id3 Menggunakan Aplikasi Data Mining Orange,” J. Teknol. Inf. J. Keilmuan dan Apl. Bid. Tek. Inform., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 189–201, 2020, doi: 10.47111/jti.v14i2.1079.

[2] F. Krisdianto, “Analisis Stabilitas Pada Tubuh Bendungan Dengan Irisan Fellenius Dan Debit Rembesan Dengan Metode Casagrande Menggunakan Software Geostudio,” 2021, [Online]. Available: https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/36134

[3] Skolnik, Derek A., and John W. Wallace. "Critical assessment of interstory drift measurements." Journal of structural engineering 136.12 (2010): 1574-1584.

[4] R. Randi, Deded Eka Sahputra, and Nanda, “Analisis Struktur Tahan Gempa Pada Office Building Di Spam (Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum) Pekanbaru-Kampar Kapasitas 1000 Liter/Detik Dengan Pushover Analysis,” Civ. Eng. Collab., vol. 9, pp. 13–19, 2024, doi: 10.35134/jcivil.v9i1.71.

[5] Y. P. A. Rumbyarso and G. Pribadi, “Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Struktur Tahan Gempa Pada Wilayah Berbeda Dengan Metode Respon Spektrum ( Studi Kasus : Apartemen 19 Lantai ),” J. Tek. Sipil dan Bangunan, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 69–72, 2024.

[6] D. Zebua and L. S. Budi Wibowo, “Pengaruh Jenis Tanah Terhadap Simpangan Lateral Gedung Beton Bertulang,” Ge-STRAM J. Perenc. dan Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2023, doi: 10.25139/jprs.v6i1.4901.

[7] T. Irawan, R. Anggrainy, and M. Agustini, “Pengaruh Gaya Gempa Terhadap Bangunan Ruko 2 Lantai Menggunakan Metode Statik Ekuivalen,” Bear. J. Penelit. dan Kaji. Tek. Sipil, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 100, 2024, doi: 10.32502/jbearing.v9i2.9091.

[8] R. Andika and T. Roesdiana, “Interpretation of SAP2000 Analysis Results Using the Design Response Spectrum Method in Earthquake Resistance in the Structural Performance of High-Story Buildings According to SNI 1726:2019,” J. World Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 196–213, 2025, doi: 10.58344/jws.v4i2.1294.

[9] N. P. Artiwi, “Kinerja Ruas Jalan Taman - Keganteran Sebagai Fungsi Aksesibilitas Dan Mobilitas Wilayah,” J. Sustain. Civ. Eng., vol. 3, no. 02, 2021, doi: 10.47080/josce.v3i02.1430.

[10] M. Syarif, S. Astika, and A. Viddy, “Study on the Application of Earthquake Resistant Standards (SNI 1726: 2019) Against Building in Yogyakarta City,” pp. 148–153, 2023, doi: 10.5220/0011729600003575.

[11] Z. Al Jauhari, A. K. Nur, R. A. Fitrah, and S. Apriwelni, “Comparative study of SNI 1726 : 2012 and SNI 1726 : 2019 guidelines for response spectrum 2D method ( study case : GKT II building of Bengkalis State Polytechnic ),” vol. 05004, pp. 1–7, 2021.

[12] Windarta, M. A. T., D. J. Jaya, and S. Widodo. "Comparative study on using of SNI 1726-2012 and SNI 1726-2019 for calculating of internal force magnitude of lecture building in DI Yogyakarta Province." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 708. No. 1. IOP Publishing, 2021.

[13] Y. Prima and A. Rumbyarso, “Perencanaan Struktur Bangunan Atas (Upper Structure) Gedung Stie Bank Bpd Jateng Kota Semarang,” J. Teknokris, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.

[14] A. Andi, B. Mahendra, and M. Ridwan, “Perencanaan Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung Enam Lantai,” Akselerasi J. Ilm. Tek. Sipil, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2023.

Downloads

Published

28/09/2025

How to Cite

[1]
“Respon Struktur Bangunan Terhadap Perbedaan Kapasitas Kolom Pada Antar Tingkat Dan Pengaruh Gaya Gempa”, jse, vol. 10, no. 4, Sep. 2025, Accessed: Oct. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://jse.serambimekkah.id/index.php/jse/article/view/1148

Similar Articles

1-10 of 48

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.