Analisis Struktur Omah Saka Papat di Blitar Terhadap Risiko Beban Gempa

Yehezkiel Septian Yoganata; Anisah Nur Fajarwati; Achendri M. Kurniawan; Aulia Rahman; Kharisma Nur Cahyani

Authors

Yehezkiel Septian Yoganata Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Politeknik Negeri Malang Author
Anisah Nur Fajarwati Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Politeknik Negeri Malang Author
Achendri M. Kurniawan Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Politeknik Negeri Malang Author
Aulia Rahman Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Politeknik Negeri Malang Author
Kharisma Nur Cahyani Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Politeknik Negeri Malang Author

Keywords:

Omah Saka Papat, analisis struktur, konstruktursi tahan gempa

Abstract

Omah Saka Papat is a traditional Javanese architectural structure. It is characterized by four main wooden pillars (saka guru). These pillars reflect the structure's adaptability to environmental conditions. This includes earthquake risks. This study will analyze the structural strength of Omah Saka Papat under seismic and self-weight loads. The saka guru is a critical element of this analysis. STAAD Pro v8i software and the response spectrum method were used to calculate internal forces and evaluate the capacity of teak wood as the primary material. The findings indicate that the combined compressive stress of 123.34 kg/cm² and shear stress of 0.83 kg/cm² are both below the allowable limits of 150.75 kg/cm² and 20.1 kg/cm², respectively. Structural joints using 12.7 mm diameter bolts satisfy the required strength criteria, with a minimum of four bolts per joint. Omah Saka Papat's structural integrity is proven. It's an earthquake-resistant construction that preserves aesthetic and cultural values. Integrating traditional design principles with modern technology provides a sustainable construction model adaptable to natural disasters. These results will undoubtedly contribute to the development of locally inspired, earthquake-resistant construction technologies suitable for seismic-prone regions.

References

[1] Y. P. Prihatmaji, “Perilaku Rumah Tradisional Jawa ‘Joglo’ terhadap Gempa,” Dimensi (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.9744/dimensi.35.1.1-12.

[2] M. R. Pratama and A. Wahyuningtyas, “Identifikasi Kearifan Lokal Terhadap Desain Rumah Tradisional Tahan Gempa: Studi Kasus pada Rumah Suku Baduy,” Menara: Jurnal Arsitektur dan Teknik Sipil, vol. 12, no. 3, Oct. 2024.

[3] Marwati, “Studi Rumah Panggung Tahan Gempa Woloan di Minahasa Manado,” Teknosains, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 95–108, Jan. 2014.

[4] S. Bahri, M. F. Hanif, M. Islam, and A. Prihatiningrum, “Perilaku dan Ketahanan Struktur Rumah Vernakuler Desa Gunung Alam Lebong terhadap Gempa Bumi,” Inersia Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 14, no. 1, Apr. 2022.

[5] R. R. Sutanto, S. Sadiyo, and N. Nugroho, “Desain Kekuatan Sambungan Geser Tunggal Menggunakan Paku pada Lima Jenis Kayu Indonesia,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 25, 2018, doi: 10.5614/jts.2018.25.1.4.

[6] Y. S. Yoganata and D. Jurusan Teknik Sipil Politeknik Negeri Malang, “Analisis Pengaruh Penggunaan Bresing Pada Struktur Bangunan Baja 20 Lantai,” Jurnal Online Skripsi Manajemen Rekayasa Konstruksi Polinema, vol. 4, pp. 366–371, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.polinema.ac.id/

[7] Y. A. Pranata, A. Kristianto, and O. C. Pattipawaej, “Pengembangan Sambungan Hubungan Join Balok-Kolom Kayu dengan Ring-Modifikasi dan Perkuatan-Paku,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 37–48, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jts/article/view/2894

[8] N. I. K. Dewi, S. N. Pratiwi, and M. N. Fajria, “Interlocking System pada Konstruksi Knock Down Bangunan Tradisional Jawa Tajug sebagai Teknologi Responsif Gempa,” Jurnal Arsitektur ZONASI, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 147, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.17509/jaz.v2i3.17610.

[9] A. N. Fajarwati, M. Efendi, S. Suhariyanto, and S. Sudarmanto, “Identifikasi Struktur Bangunan Rumah Tradisional di Desa Pinggirpapas,” NALARs, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 139, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.24853/nalars.19.2.139-148.

[10] Y. S. Yoganata, B. Suswanto, D. Iranata, and D. Irawan, “Analysis study of extended end plate connection due to cyclic load using finite element method,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 930, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/930/1/012050.

[11] D. Yusrina, “Analisis Elemen Struktur Tahan Gempa Pada Rumah Tradisional,” Pawon: Jurnal Arsitketur, 2023.

[12] A. Munandar, “Analisis Fenomena Kerentanan Rumah Tradisional Masyarakat Kobe dengan Rumah Tradisional Masyarakat Lombok terhadap Bencana Gempa Bumi,” MIMBAR : Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Politik, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 5, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.32663/jpsp.v7i2.680.

[13] A. Saefudin, “Pemanfaatan Kayu Sebagai Bahan Struktur Bangunan,” Jurnal Menara Teknik Sipil FT UNJ, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 23–36, Jan. 2007.

[14] E. S. Yupa, T. A. Agyms, V. E. Fernando, Y. F. Sidabutar, and H. Suciati, “Analisis Penggunaan Kayu sebagai Bahan Konstruksi dalam Pembangunan: Studi Kasus dan Observasi Lapangan ,” Jurnal Online Universitas Batam, pp. 1–6, 2024.

[15] Wahiddin, A. Sugiarto, A. Naibaho, and K. Purwitasari, “Implementasi Building Information Modelling (Bim) Pada Desain Sambungan Balok-Kolom Struktur Baja,” Jurnal Online Skripsi …, vol. 4, pp. 350–354, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.polinema.ac.id/index.php/jos-mrk/article/view/4534